Rise High: An investigation of a pilot careers and skills development programme for young people in rural and semi-rural areas in Derbyshire

Krisha Bainham

doi:10.20856/jnicec.5613

Authors

Krisha Bainham University of Derby

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20856/jnicec.5613

Keywords:

career progression, outreach, rural careers, Widening participation, Evaluation, measuring impact

Abstract

The Rise High programme, a collaboration between the University of Derby and the Chatsworth House Trust, explores a progressive, sustained approach to careers outreach with under-represented young people in rural and semi-rural areas. This case study examines emerging evaluation findings, showing early evidence that the programme has strengthened participants’ understanding of career pathways over time and supported the development of skills and confidence. Impacts on university aspirations or motivation in current studies are less conclusive, highlighting potential for future programme development. The case study concludes by situating the programme within the local and wider political context of rurality and hidden disadvantage.

References

Action with Communities in Rural England. (ACRE) (2014). Policy Position Paper, Children and Young People. Oxfordshire: ACRE.

Adler, K., Salantera, S., & Zumstein-Shaha, M. (2019). Focus Group Interviews in Child, Youth, and Parent Research: An Integrative Literature Review in International Journal of Qualitative Methods Volume 18: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919887274

Aldridge Foundation. (2023). The forgotten generation: city v countryside divide revealed. Available at: https://www.aldridgefoundation.com/news-item/the-forgotten-generation-city-v-countryside-divide-revealed/ accessed on 27 September 2024.

Ankrah, S. & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review in Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31 (3), 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003

Atherton, G. & Webb, C. (Eds). (2022). Levelling Up: What is it and can it work? London: Centre for Inequality and Levelling Up (CEILUP).

Bainham, K. (2019). The impacts and benefits of employing a progressive and sustained approach to outreach programmes for universities: a case study – the progress to success framework in Broadhead, S., Butcher, J., Hill, M., Mckendry, S., Raven, N., Renton, R., Sanderson, B., Ward, T. & Williams, S. W. (eds.). ‘Transformative Higher Education – Access, Inclusion & Lifelong Learning’. London: FACE: Forum for Access and Continuing Education, pp. 193-213.

Bolton, P. & Lewis, J. (2024). Equality of access and outcomes in higher education in England. London: House of Commons Library.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A practical guide. London: SAGE.

Bromley, M. (2016). Avoiding the year 8 ‘dip’ in SecEd, 24, 4-4.

Careers and Enterprise Company. (2023). From Outreach to Intake: Employer Standards for Careers Education. London: Careers and Enterprise Company. Available at: https://www.careersandenterprise.co.uk/media/4xrpq1ki/employer-standards-insight-briefing.pdf accessed on 27 September 2024.

CFE Research. (2023). The benefits of and barriers to collaborative access activity by higher education providers. A report for the OfS. Leicester: CFE Research.

Commission for Rural Communities. (2012). Barriers to education, employment and training for young people in rural areas. Gloucester: Commission for Rural Communities.

Corbett, M. & Forsey, M. (2017). Rural youth out-migration and education: challenges to aspirations discourse in mobile modernity in Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1308456

Davids, S. (2024). Increasing Access to Higher Education for Underrepresented Groups. National Institute of Economic and Social Research blog post, accessed on 27 November 2024 at https://niesr.ac.uk/blog/increasing-access-higher-education-underrepresented-groups

Doddington, C., Flutter, J., & Rudduck, J. (1999). Exploring and Explaining ‘Dips’ in Motivation and Performance in Primary and Secondary Schooling in Research in Education, 61(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.61.4

Eddy, P.L. (2010). Partnerships and collaboration in higher education: ASHE Higher Education Report. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/educationbookchapters/38?utm_source=scholarworks.wm.edu%2Feducationbookchapters%2F38&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

Farmer, J.C., Baird, A.G., Iversen, L. (2001) Rural deprivation: reflecting reality in British Journal of General Practice 2001, 51 (467), 486-491.

Fecht, D., Jones, A,. Hill, T., Lindfield, T., Thomson, R,. Hansell, A.L., Shukla, R. (2018). Inequalities in rural communities: adapting national deprivation indices for rural settings in Journal of Public Health 2018, 40 (2), 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx048

Hanson, J., Moore, N., Clark, L., & Neary, S. (2021). An evaluation of the North East of England pilot of the Gatsby Benchmarks of good career guidance. Derby: University of Derby.

Harding, S., & Bowes, L. (2022). Fourth independent review of impact evaluation evidence submitted by Uni Connect partnerships: A summary of the local impact evidence to date for the Office for Students. London, Office for Students.

Harrison, N. & Hatt, S. (2010). ‘Disadvantaged Learners’: Who Are We Targeting? Understanding the Targeting of Widening Participation Activity in the United Kingdom Using Geo-Demographic Data From Southwest England in Higher Education Quarterly, 64 (1), 65-88.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2009.00431.x

Haynes, R. & Gale, S. (2000). Deprivation and Poor Health in Rural Areas: Inequalities Hidden by Averages in Health and Place 2000, 6 (4), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-8292(00)00009-5

Graham, L. (2024). The Grass Ceiling: Hidden Educational Barriers in Rural England in Education Science 2024, 14 (2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020165

IntoUniversity. (2015). Rural aspiration: access to Higher Education in rural, coastal and dispersed communities. London: IntoUniversity.

Jerrim, J. (2021) Measuring disadvantage. The Sutton Trust, 9.

Lally, C. & Bermingham, R. (2020). COVID-19 and the disadvantage gap, London: The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology.

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.

Martin, A.J., Collie, R.J., Stephan, M., Flesken, A. (2024). What is the role of teaching support in students’ motivation and engagement trajectories during adolescence? A four-year latent growth modeling study in Learning and Instruction, 92, 101910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101910

McGuigan, M., McNally, S. & Wyness, G. (2016). Student awareness of costs and benefits of educational decisions: effects of an information campaign in Journal of Human Capital, 10 (4), 482-519. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/689551

Milbourne, P. & Kitchen, L. (2014). Rural mobilities: Connecting movement and fixity in rural places in Journal of Rural Studies, 34, April 2014, 326-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.004

Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government. (2019). Accredited official statistics: English indices of deprivation 2019. London: Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government.

Moore, N., Clark, L., Neary, S., & Blake, H. (2021). Crucial impacts on career choices: Research to understand the influences on young people’s choices in primary and secondary schools: Final report. Derby: University of Derby.

O'Dwyer, L. M. & Bernauer, J. A. (2014). Quantitative Research for the Qualitative Researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335674.n2

Office for Health Improvement and Disparities. (2018). Process evaluation: evaluation in health and wellbeing, London: Office for Health Improvement and Disparities.

Office for Students (OfS). (2018). National Collaborative Outreach Programme: The first year. London: Office for Students.

Office for Students. (2021). Access and participation glossary. Available at: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/for-providers/equality-of-opportunity/access-and-participation-glossary accessed on 10 November 2021.

Office for Students. (2023). Regulatory notice 1: Access and participation plan guidance. London: Office for Students.

Office for Students. (2024). Access and participation data dashboard. Available at: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/data-and-analysis/access-and-participation-data-dashboard/ accessed on 27 September 2024.

Patel, R. & Bowes, L. (2021). Third independent review of impact evaluation submitted by Uni Connect partnerships: A summary of the local impact evidence to date for the Office for Students. London, Office for Students.

Pickering, N. (2021). Enabling equality of access in higher education for underrepresented groups: a realist ‘small step’ approach to evaluating widening participation in Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 26(1), 111–130 https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2021.1873410

Robinson, D. & Salvestrini, V. (2020). The impact of interventions for widening access to education. A review of the evidence. Education Policy Institute for the Centre for Transforming Access and Student Outcomes in Higher Education (TASO). London, Education Policy Institute.

Scharrer, E., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2021). Quantitative Research Methods in Communication: The Power of Numbers for Social Justice (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003091653

The Purpose Coalition. (2021). University Best Practice White Paper. Available at: https://www.levellingupuniversitiescoalition.org/white-paper accessed 3 February 2022

Thiele, T., Pope, D., Singleton, A. & Stanistreet, D. (2018). Exploring the use of mixed methods in research and evaluation of widening participation interventions: guidance for practitioners in Journal of Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning Volume 20, Number 4, 7-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.20A.7

Transforming Access and Student Outcomes in Education (TASO). (2021). Summary report: An investigation into the relationship between outreach participation and KS4 attainment/HE progression. London: TASO.

Transforming Access and Student Outcomes in Education (TASO). (2023). The importance of developing a Theory of Change. Accessible at: https://taso.org.uk/news-item/the-importance-of-developing-a-theory-of-change/

Tuckett, S., Hunt, E., Robinson, D., & Cruikshanks, R. (2022). Covid-19 and Disadvantage Gaps in England 2021. London: Education Policy Institute.

Williams, J., Rosolin, B., Newton, B., Neary, S., Blake, H. and Rose, P. (2024). Effective Transitions Fund evaluation. London: Careers and Enterprise Company.

Woodward, R. (1996). 'Deprivation" and ‘the Rural': an Investigation into Contradictory Discourses in Journal of Rural Studies, 12 (1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(95)00048-8

Zelenina, A., Shalnova, S., Maksimov, S., & Drapkina, O. (2022). Classification of Deprivation Indices That Applied to Detect Health Inequality: A Scoping Review in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 10063. 10.3390/ijerph191610063